Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
1990 ›
FI ›
FIRE WATCH
Trademark search for:
FIRE WATCH
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-12-19 — Application filed
2007-12-26 — Application filed
2007-12-27 — Notice of design search code mailed
2008-03-25 — Assigned to examiner
2008-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-30 — Paper received
2008-10-15 — Assigned to lie
2008-10-16 — Amendment from applicant entered
2008-10-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-10-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-10-23 — Law office publication review completed
2008-11-03 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2008-11-10 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2008-11-21 — Office action issued
2008-11-21 — Office action issued
2008-11-21 — Office action issued
2009-05-28 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2009-05-30 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2009-05-30 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2009-06-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-06-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-06-17 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-06-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-06-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-06-22 — Assigned to lie
2009-06-24 — Law office publication review completed
2009-07-08 — Notice of publication
2009-07-28 — Published for opposition
2009-08-27 — Extension of time to oppose received
2009-10-12 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
2009-11-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-05-24 — Sou teas extension received
2010-05-24 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-05-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-05-26 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2010-06-23 — Teas statement of use received
2010-06-23 — Use amendment filed
2010-07-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-07-19 — Statement of use processing complete
2010-07-23 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2010-07-23 — Law office registration review completed
2010-07-24 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2010-08-31 — Registered-principal register
2016-08-11 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2016-10-17 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2016-10-17 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
2017-03-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2017-03-13 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2017-03-13 — Post registration action mailed no response required
2019-08-31 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2020-11-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2020-11-20 — Teas change of owner address received
2020-11-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-11-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2020-11-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-11-20 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2021-02-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-02-11 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-02-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-02-11 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-02-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-04-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-04-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
IQ wireless GmbH
Berlin DE
IQ wireless GmbH
Berlin DE
IQ wireless GmbH
Berlin DE
Correspondent
Michael T. Smith BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP 8110 Gatehouse Road, Suite 100 East Falls Church, VA 22042 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-12-19
Status Date:
2021-04-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.