Trademark search for:

THE POWER TO PREDICT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1993-04-28 — Application filed
1993-08-24 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1993-09-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-09-20 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1993-10-04 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
1993-10-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-11-26 — Notice of publication
1993-12-28 — Published for opposition
1994-03-22 — Registered-principal register
2000-03-21 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2000-06-06 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
2000-07-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2004-03-22 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2004-03-22 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-05-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-05-01 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2006-05-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2006-05-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-08-29 — Case file in ticrs
2016-02-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-02-19 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Retail Merchandising Service Automation, Inc.
Riverside , CA

Retail Merchandising Service Automation, Inc.
Riverside , CA

Retail Merchandising Service Automation, Inc.
Riverside , CA

Correspondent

CURTIS CAPELING HARWELL HOWARD HYNE GABBERT & MANNER, P
315 DEADERICK ST STE 1800
NASHVILLE, TN 37238-1800
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1993-04-28

Status Date:
2016-02-19

Category:
Advertising & Business

Filing Year:
1993

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.