Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2000 ›
BA ›
BARTERNET EXCHANGE
Trademark search for:
BARTERNET EXCHANGE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2000-05-24 — Application filed
2000-07-17 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2000-07-17 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2001-02-02 — Assigned to examiner
2001-02-13 — Assigned to examiner
2001-02-27 — Assigned to examiner
2001-03-01 — Final disposition recorded
2001-08-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2002-01-16 — Examiners amendment mailed
2002-01-24 — Examiners amendment mailed
2002-01-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2002-06-05 — Notice of publication
2002-06-25 — Published for opposition
2002-08-10 — Assigned to examiner
2002-08-10 — Assigned to examiner
2002-08-10 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2002-08-10 — Assigned to examiner
2002-08-12 — Letter of suspension mailed
2003-02-14 — Paper received
2003-02-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-03-10 — Assigned to examiner
2003-08-06 — Letter of suspension mailed
2003-10-27 — Paper received
2003-10-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-11-28 — Case file in ticrs
2003-12-03 — Assigned to examiner
2004-01-19 — Application abandoned
2004-01-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
BarterNet Corporation
Foster City , CA
BarterNet Corporation
Foster City , CA
Correspondent
MARTIN F MAJESTIC FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL 1300 I ST NW WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2000-05-24
Status Date:
2004-01-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.