Trademark search for:

NOBODY KNOWS BATHS BETTER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2000-02-23 — Application filed
2000-07-19 — Assigned to examiner
2000-07-31 — Final disposition recorded
2001-01-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-03-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2001-05-30 — Notice of publication
2001-06-12 — Published for opposition
2001-09-04 — Registered-principal register
2007-02-01 — Case file in ticrs
2007-09-04 — Teas section 8 received
2007-09-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
2007-09-17 — Assigned to paralegal
2007-09-18 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2007-10-11 — Paper received
2007-10-25 — Review of correspondence complete
2011-04-01 — Paper received
2011-04-04 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2011-04-04 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2011-04-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2012-01-04 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2015-10-21 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2020-09-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-03-18 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-03-18 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

WINSUPPLY INC.
DAYTON , OH

WINWHOLESALE INC.
DAYTON , OH

Noland Company
Newport News , VA

Noland Company
Newport News , VA

Noland Company
Newport News , VA

Correspondent

B. JOSEPH SCHAEFF DINSMORE & SHOHL LLP
ONE DAYTON CENTRE, ONE SOUTH MAIN STREET
SUITE 1300
DAYTON, OH 45402

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2000-02-23

Status Date:
2022-03-18

Category:
Advertising & Business

Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.