Brandinium

Trademark search for:

GREG LLOYD SMITH

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-03-24 — Application filed
  • 2002-07-29 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-07-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2002-09-25 — Notice of publication
  • 2002-10-15 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-01-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2003-07-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2003-08-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2003-09-25 — Application abandoned
  • 2003-10-06 — Use amendment filed
  • 2003-10-06 — Paper received
  • 2003-10-06 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2004-03-22 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2004-03-29 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2004-03-29 — Email received
  • 2004-03-31 — Paper received
  • 2004-04-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-05-10 — Paper received
  • 2004-05-24 — Fax sent
  • 2004-05-24 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2004-06-01 — Paper received
  • 2004-06-01 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2004-06-09 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2004-06-16 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2004-06-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-07-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-07-24 — Office action issued
  • 2004-07-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-07-29 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2004-08-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2004-08-17 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-09-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-09-04 — Office action issued
  • 2004-09-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-09-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-09-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2004-09-26 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2004-10-04 — Assigned to lie
  • 2004-10-14 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2004-12-21 — Registered-principal register
  • 2006-03-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-03-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-12-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2007-02-28 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2007-02-28 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2007-08-08 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2008-01-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2008-01-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-06-06 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2008-06-06 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2008-08-01 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2008-08-01 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-04-03 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-04-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-04-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-09-05 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2009-09-05 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2011-01-24 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2011-01-24 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2011-02-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2011-07-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2011-07-22 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

3105 LIMITED
Pontypridd GB
MAYSIDE, INC.
Lewes , DE
BAOU TRUST
NEW YORK , NY
BAOU TRUST
NEW YORK , NY
MPC TRUST
NEW YORK , NY
Smith, Greg Lloyd
Lewes , DE
Smith, Greg Lloyd
Lewes , DE

Correspondent

GREG SMITH CPM Partnership
2780 So. Jones Blvd.
Suite 3635
Las Vegas, NV 89146

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-03-24
Status Date:
2011-07-22
Category:
Advertising & Business
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.