Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2003 ›
SA ›
SALES VELOCITY
Trademark search for:
SALES VELOCITY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-12-03 — Application filed
2003-12-29 — Application filed
2004-06-16 — Assigned to examiner
2004-07-06 — Final disposition recorded
2004-09-27 — Office action issued
2004-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-09-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-10-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-11-03 — Assigned to lie
2004-11-03 — Law office publication review completed
2004-12-22 — Notice of publication
2005-01-11 — Published for opposition
2005-04-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-09-29 — Sou teas extension received
2005-09-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-10-11 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-03-20 — Sou teas extension received
2006-03-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-03-20 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-05-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-05-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-09-19 — Sou teas extension received
2006-09-19 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-09-19 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-03-30 — Sou teas extension received
2007-03-30 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-03-30 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-10-06 — Final status recorded
2007-12-12 — Application abandoned
2007-12-12 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
MacKinnon, John
Concord , MA
MacKinnon, John
Concord , MA
Correspondent
DAVID E PLOTKIN PRINCE, LOBEL, GLOVSKY & TYE 100 CAMBRIDGE ST STE 2200 BOSTON, MA 02114 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-12-03
Status Date:
2007-10-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.