Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2006 ›
CH ›
CHURCH BOY
Trademark search for:
CHURCH BOY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-05-14 — Application filed
2006-05-19 — Application filed
2006-07-20 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2006-07-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-08-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-10-17 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-18 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-18 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-25 — Office action issued
2007-03-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-03-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-04-18 — Office action issued
2007-04-18 — Office action issued
2007-06-20 — Office action issued
2007-06-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-06-29 — Assigned to lie
2007-06-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-07-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-07-12 — Law office publication review completed
2007-07-25 — Notice of publication
2007-08-14 — Published for opposition
2007-09-10 — Extension of time to oppose received
2008-02-08 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2008-07-22 — Application abandoned
2008-07-22 — Application abandoned
2008-07-22 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2008-07-22 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2008-07-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Church Boy
Tampa , FL
Church Boy
Tampa , FL
Correspondent
Kenneth Beyers Keeling Patents and Trademarks 3310 Katy Freeway, Ste 200 Houston, TX 77007 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-05-14
Status Date:
2008-07-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.