Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ST. LUKE'S CELEBRATION

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2006-01-06 — Application filed
  • 2006-01-11 — Application filed
  • 2006-06-02 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-06-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-06-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-12-05 — Office action issued
  • 2007-01-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-01-09 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-01-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-01-23 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-01-23 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2007-08-02 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2007-10-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-04-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-04-09 — Office action issued
  • 2008-04-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-05-02 — Office action issued
  • 2008-05-02 — Office action issued
  • 2008-11-03 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2008-11-03 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2008-11-03 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2008-11-03 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2008-11-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-11-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-11-24 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-11-25 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2008-12-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2008-12-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-12-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-12-28 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-12-29 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2009-01-28 — Teas amendment of use received
  • 2009-01-28 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-01-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-01-29 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 2009-01-29 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-01-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-02-03 — Office action issued
  • 2009-02-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-02-03 — Use amendment accepted
  • 2009-03-05 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2009-03-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-03-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-03-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-03-06 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-03-25 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-04-14 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-06-10 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2009-09-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-09-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-10-01 — Concurrent use proc. instituted no. 999999
  • 2010-01-21 — Concurrent use proc. instituted no. 999999
  • 2010-11-03 — Concurrent use proc. instituted no. 999999
  • 2011-02-12 — Concurrent use proc. instituted no. 999999
  • 2011-05-20 — Concurrent use granted no. 999999
  • 2011-09-13 — Concurrent use terminated no. 999999
  • 2011-09-13 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2011-11-01 — Registered-principal register
  • 2016-11-01 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-06-08 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-06-08 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd.
Boise , ID
St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd.
Boise , ID
St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd.
Boise , ID

Correspondent

Christine Nicholas Moffatt Thomas Barrett Rock & Fields, Chtd.
101 S. Capitol Blvd., 10th Floor
Boise, ID 83701
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-01-06
Status Date:
2018-06-08
Category:
Advertising & Business
Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.