Brandinium

Trademark search for:

DE LA ROSE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2007-08-11 — Application filed
  • 2007-08-15 — Application filed
  • 2007-08-16 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2007-11-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-11-27 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
  • 2007-11-27 — Notification of examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
  • 2007-11-27 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
  • 2007-11-27 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-12-04 — Office action issued
  • 2007-12-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-12-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-12-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-05-28 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2008-05-28 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-05-28 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-05-28 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-06-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-06-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-06-18 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-07-08 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-09-30 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-05-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-05-04 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-05-04 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

de la rose, LLC
Dana Point , CA
de la rose, LLC
Dana Point , CA

Correspondent

RENEE GABBARD
10 VIA SIENNA
DANA POINT, CA 92629-3358
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-08-11
Status Date:
2009-05-04
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.