Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EVERY MOVEMENT, EVERY MOMENT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2007-08-16 — Application filed
  • 2007-08-21 — Application filed
  • 2007-11-25 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-12-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-03-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-03-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-03-25 — Office action issued
  • 2008-03-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-03-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-04-07 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-04-07 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-04-23 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-05-13 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-08-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-02-05 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2009-03-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-03-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2009-05-08 — Sou extension received with teas petition
  • 2009-05-08 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2009-05-08 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2009-06-04 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-06-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2009-08-04 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-08-04 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2009-08-04 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2009-08-04 — Divisional request received
  • 2009-08-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-08-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-08-12 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2009-08-12 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-01-21 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2010-01-29 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-01-29 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2010-02-03 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2010-07-31 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-07-31 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2010-08-06 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2010-08-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-09-17 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-09-17 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2010-09-17 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-09-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-09-17 — Divisional request received
  • 2010-09-23 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2010-09-23 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-10-14 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-10-27 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-10-27 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-10-28 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2010-11-30 — Registered-principal register
  • 2011-08-10 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2011-09-09 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-09-09 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-10-02 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2013-11-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-11-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2015-02-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-11-30 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2016-01-20 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2016-01-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2017-07-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-07-07 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

FAM, LLC
Bell , CA
ZOBHA LICENSING, LLC
CHESTERFIELD , MO
ZOBHA LLC
MILL VALLEY , CA
ZOBHA LLC
MILL VALLEY , CA
Zobha Limited
Hong Kong HK
Zobha Limited
Hong Kong HK

Correspondent

Irene Y. Lee Russ August & Kabat
12424 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1200
Los Angeles, CA 90025
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-08-16
Status Date:
2017-07-07
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.