Brandinium

Trademark search for:

MY EROS GUIDE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2007-10-25 — Application filed
  • 2007-10-30 — Application filed
  • 2008-02-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-02-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-02-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-02-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-04 — Paper received
  • 2008-08-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-08-07 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-07 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2008-08-07 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-07 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-12-22 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2008-12-22 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2009-02-09 — Paper received
  • 2009-02-11 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-02-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-02-11 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2009-02-11 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-02-11 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-02-11 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-02-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-02-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-03-04 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-03-24 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-05-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-05-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-06-16 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2009-06-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-06-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-07-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-07-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-07-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-07-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-10-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-12-15 — Paper received
  • 2009-12-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-02-22 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-02-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-03-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-05-26 — Paper received
  • 2010-05-26 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2010-06-02 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2010-06-03 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2010-12-16 — Paper received
  • 2010-12-16 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-01-03 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-01-04 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2011-06-16 — Paper received
  • 2011-06-16 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2011-06-22 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2011-06-23 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2011-12-16 — Use amendment filed
  • 2011-12-16 — Paper received
  • 2011-12-16 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2012-01-30 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-01-30 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2012-01-31 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2012-02-10 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2012-02-28 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2012-02-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-02-29 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use mailed
  • 2012-04-03 — Registered-principal register
  • 2014-11-05 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2018-11-09 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-11-09 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

INDIGO NETHERLANDS B.V.
AMSTERDAM NL
Group Kaitu, LLC
Richmond , VA
Group Kaitu, LLC
Richmond , VA
Group Kaitu, LLC
Richmond , VA

Correspondent

PAMELA C. GAVIN GAVIN LAW OFFICES, PLC
2500 GASKINS ROAD, SUITE B
RICHMOND, VA 23238
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-10-25
Status Date:
2018-11-09
Category:
Advertising & Business
Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.