Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2008 ›
AC ›
ACE IMAGEWEAR SAFETY APPAREL & EQUIPMENT
Trademark search for:
ACE IMAGEWEAR SAFETY APPAREL & EQUIPMENT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-05-06 — Application filed
2008-05-09 — Application filed
2008-05-10 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2008-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2008-08-20 — Assigned to examiner
2008-08-20 — Final disposition recorded
2009-02-20 — Office action issued
2009-02-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-02-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-03-13 — Office action issued
2009-03-13 — Office action issued
2009-03-13 — Office action issued
2009-09-14 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-09-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-09-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-09-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-09-26 — Assigned to lie
2009-09-26 — Law office publication review completed
2009-11-03 — Published for opposition
2009-11-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-01-26 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-08-30 — Application abandoned
2010-08-30 — Application abandoned
2010-08-30 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Heilman Holding Company
Kansas City , MO
Heilman Holding Company
Kansas City , MO
Correspondent
THOMAS E. ROSZAK DYSART TAYLOR LAY COTTER & MCMONIGLE, P.C. 4420 MADISON AVENUE KANSAS CITY, MO 64111 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-05-06
Status Date:
2010-08-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.