Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2009 ›
PP ›
P.E.A.K.PERFORMANCE
Trademark search for:
P.E.A.K.PERFORMANCE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-01-22 — Application filed
2009-01-26 — Application filed
2009-01-27 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-01 — Removed from teas plus
2009-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-01 — Assigned to examiner
2009-04-01 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-04-02 — Office action issued
2009-04-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-04-14 — Office action issued
2009-04-14 — Office action issued
2009-04-14 — Office action issued
2009-04-23 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-04-25 — Assigned to lie
2009-04-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-04-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-05-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-05-26 — Law office publication review completed
2009-06-10 — Notice of publication
2009-06-30 — Published for opposition
2009-07-29 — Extension of time to oppose received
2009-11-13 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
2009-12-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-08-02 — Application abandoned
2010-08-02 — Application abandoned
2010-08-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
BLCPro LLC
New London , CT
BLCPro LLC
New London , CT
Correspondent
BLCPRO LLC 125 EUGENE ONEILL DR STE 305 NEW LONDON, CT 06320-6410 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-01-22
Status Date:
2010-08-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.