Brandinium

Trademark search for:

REPAIRSDOT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-03-25 — Application filed
  • 2009-03-28 — Application filed
  • 2009-03-30 — Application filed
  • 2009-03-31 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2009-06-02 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-06-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-12-09 — Paper received
  • 2009-12-17 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2009-12-17 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-12-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-01-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-01-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-19 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2010-07-07 — Office action issued
  • 2010-07-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-07-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-07-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-07-15 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-08-17 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-08-17 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-10-12 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2011-04-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-04-12 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2011-04-12 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2011-04-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2011-04-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-04-15 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2011-04-16 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-10-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-10-12 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-10-14 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-10-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-04-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-04-12 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2012-05-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2012-05-24 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-08-27 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2012-08-27 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-08-29 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-21 — Paper received
  • 2013-03-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-03-28 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2013-03-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-04-12 — Office action issued
  • 2013-04-12 — Office action issued
  • 2013-04-12 — Office action issued
  • 2013-10-22 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2013-10-23 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2013-10-23 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2013-11-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-11-13 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2013-11-13 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2014-01-29 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2014-03-28 — Su - examiner statement - written
  • 2014-03-28 — Notification of examiners statement e-mailed
  • 2014-03-28 — Examiners statement e-mailed
  • 2014-04-21 — Reply brief filed - check ttab files
  • 2014-07-09 — Office action issued
  • 2014-09-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2014-09-24 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2014-09-24 — Final status recorded
  • 2014-09-25 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

BUSHNELL, ROBERT E
Washington , DC
BUSHNELL, ROBERT E
WASHINGTON , DC
Paul E. Bushnell
New Orleans , LA

Correspondent

ROBERT E BUSHNELL ROBERT E BUSHNELL & LAW FIRM
2029 K ST NW
STE 600
WASHINGTON, DC 20006-1004

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-03-25
Status Date:
2014-09-24
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.