Brandinium

Trademark search for:

VERTEX BUSINESS SERVICES

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2009-06-04 — Application filed
  • 2009-06-08 — Application filed
  • 2009-06-09 — Application filed
  • 2009-09-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-11-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-11-20 — Office action issued
  • 2009-11-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-12-30 — Office action issued
  • 2009-12-30 — Office action issued
  • 2009-12-30 — Office action issued
  • 2010-04-30 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2010-04-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-04-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-05-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-27 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2010-05-27 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2010-06-29 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2010-06-29 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2010-06-29 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2010-08-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-08-02 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2010-08-02 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2010-09-28 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2010-11-23 — Examiners statement - completed
  • 2010-11-23 — Notification of examiners statement e-mailed
  • 2010-11-23 — Examiners statement e-mailed
  • 2010-12-30 — Reply brief filed - check ttab files
  • 2011-03-03 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2011-03-05 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2011-03-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-03-05 — Exparte appeal terminated
  • 2011-03-05 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-03-05 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2011-03-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2011-03-11 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-03-11 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-04-19 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-04-19 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2011-06-14 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2011-07-28 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2011-07-28 — Use amendment filed
  • 2011-08-04 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2011-08-04 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2011-08-15 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2011-08-16 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2011-09-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-20 — Office action issued
  • 2011-09-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-10-20 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2011-10-25 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2011-10-26 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2011-11-29 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-07-18 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2013-07-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2016-11-29 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-07-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2018-07-06 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Vertex Data Science Limited
Gloucestershire GB
Vertex Data Science Limited
London GB
Vertex Data Science Limited
Merseyside GB

Correspondent

CHARLES J MEYER WOODARD EMHARDT MORIARTY ET AL
111 MONUMENT CIRCLE
SUITE 3700
INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-06-04
Status Date:
2018-07-06
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.