Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2010 ›
CH ›
CHINA DOORWAYS
Trademark search for:
CHINA DOORWAYS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-09-16 — Application filed
2010-09-20 — Application filed
2010-09-21 — Application filed
2010-12-16 — Assigned to examiner
2010-12-16 — Final disposition recorded
2010-12-16 — Final disposition recorded
2011-05-31 — Office action issued
2011-05-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-05-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-06-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-06-17 — Assigned to lie
2011-06-17 — Law office publication review completed
2011-07-06 — Notice of publication
2011-07-26 — Published for opposition
2011-09-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-03-13 — Sou teas extension received
2012-03-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-03-13 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-03-15 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-06-20 — Sou teas extension received
2012-06-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-07-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-07-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-07-18 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2013-04-22 — Application abandoned
2013-04-22 — Application abandoned
2013-04-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Hicken, William M.
Mount Pleasant , SC
Hicken, William M.
Mount Pleasant , SC
Correspondent
JOHN N. JENNISON JENNISON & SHULTZ, P.C. 2001 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 1102 ARLINGTON, VA 22202-3618 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-09-16
Status Date:
2013-04-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.