Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2010 ›
VA ›
VALUEOPTIONS CARE-CONTINUITY ENGINE
Trademark search for:
VALUEOPTIONS CARE-CONTINUITY ENGINE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-11-24 — Application filed
2010-11-27 — Application filed
2010-12-01 — Application filed
2010-12-02 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2011-01-12 — Assigned to examiner
2011-01-18 — Final disposition recorded
2011-01-18 — Final disposition recorded
2011-07-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-07-15 — Office action issued
2011-07-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-08-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-08-15 — Assigned to lie
2011-08-16 — Law office publication review completed
2011-08-31 — Notice of publication
2011-09-20 — Published for opposition
2011-11-15 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-03-25 — Sou teas extension received
2012-03-25 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-03-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-03-27 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2012-10-04 — Sou teas extension received
2012-10-04 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-10-05 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-10-09 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-10-10 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2013-06-17 — Application abandoned
2013-06-17 — Application abandoned
2013-06-17 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ValueOptions, Inc.
Norfolk , VA
ValueOptions, Inc.
Norfolk , VA
Correspondent
PETER E. BROADBENT, JR. CHRISTIAN & BARTON, LLP 909 E MAIN ST STE 1200 RICHMOND, VA 23219-3013
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-11-24
Status Date:
2013-06-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.