Brandinium

Trademark search for:

LES THÉS CAESARS TEA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2011-06-07 — Application filed
  • 2011-06-10 — Application filed
  • 2011-06-10 — Application filed
  • 2011-09-21 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2011-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-12-13 — Office action issued
  • 2011-12-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-12-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-12-16 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-12-16 — Suspension letter written
  • 2011-12-16 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-05-11 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-05-24 — Assigned to lie
  • 2012-06-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-06-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-06-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2012-06-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-06-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2012-06-13 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2012-10-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-10-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2012-10-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-11-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-11-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-11-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-11-15 — Office action issued
  • 2012-11-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-11-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-11-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-11-21 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-11-29 — Withdrawn from pub otqr request
  • 2012-12-04 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2012-12-04 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2012-12-04 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-12-04 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2012-12-04 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2012-12-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-12-05 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-12-07 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2012-12-07 — Withdrawn from pub - senior attorney request
  • 2012-12-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-12-11 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-12-26 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2013-01-15 — Published for opposition
  • 2013-01-15 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2013-01-18 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2013-05-15 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2014-06-28 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2014-06-28 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2014-06-28 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2014-08-05 — Registered-principal register
  • 2019-08-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2019-11-03 — Teas section 8 received
  • 2019-11-25 — Registered - partial sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
  • 2019-11-25 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2019-11-25 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
  • 2023-08-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2025-02-21 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2025-02-21 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CAESARS TEA INC.
ST. LAURENT, QUEBEC CA
CAESARS TEA INC.
ST. LAURENT, QUEBEC CA
CAESARS TEA INC.
ST. LAURENT, QUEBEC CA
ILANCO INTERNATIONAL FASHIONS INC
Saint-Laurent, Quebec CA

Correspondent

JAY BEGLER NIESAR & VESTAL LLP
90 NEW MONTGOMERY STREET
9TH FLOOR
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2011-06-07
Status Date:
2025-02-21
Filing Year:
2011

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.