Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2011 ›
YU ›
YUSEI GACHI
Trademark search for:
YUSEI GACHI
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-11-30 — Application filed
2011-12-03 — Application filed
2011-12-06 — Application filed
2012-03-13 — Assigned to examiner
2012-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2012-09-10 — Office action issued
2012-09-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-09-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-10-12 — Office action issued
2012-10-12 — Office action issued
2012-10-12 — Office action issued
2013-05-31 — Application abandoned
2013-05-31 — Application abandoned
2013-07-30 — Office action issued
2013-07-30 — Petition to revive-received
2013-07-30 — Teas petition to revive received
2013-07-31 — Assigned to petition staff
2013-08-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-08-01 — Petition granted - response received
2013-08-01 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2013-08-01 — Assigned to lie
2013-08-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-02-21 — Assigned to petition staff
2014-02-22 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
2014-02-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-02-27 — Assigned to lie
2014-02-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-04-09 — Petition to revive-denied
2014-04-09 — Final status recorded
Correspondent
JARRETT K. PAYNE NW VENTURE LAW, PLLC 600 UNIVERSITY ST STE 1919 SEATTLE, WA 98101-1129 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-11-30
Status Date:
2014-04-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.