Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2012 ›
GO ›
GOODMAN PARTNERS
Trademark search for:
GOODMAN PARTNERS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-05-02 — Application filed
2012-05-05 — Application filed
2012-05-09 — Application filed
2012-08-16 — Assigned to examiner
2012-08-23 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-23 — Final disposition recorded
2012-08-23 — Final disposition recorded
2013-02-20 — Office action issued
2013-02-21 — Assigned to lie
2013-03-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-03-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-03-26 — Suspension letter written
2013-03-26 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-03-26 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-10-08 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2013-11-02 — Suspension inquiry written
2013-11-02 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2013-11-02 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-02-21 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-02-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-03-20 — Suspension letter written
2014-03-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-03-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-09-23 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2014-10-15 — Suspension inquiry written
2014-10-15 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2014-10-15 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2014-12-08 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2014-12-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-12-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-12-21 — Suspension letter written
2014-12-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-12-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-06-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2015-07-10 — Suspension inquiry written
2015-07-10 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2015-07-10 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2015-09-16 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2015-09-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-09-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-10-02 — Suspension letter written
2015-10-02 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2015-10-02 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-03-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-04-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2016-05-16 — Suspension inquiry written
2016-05-16 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2016-05-16 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2016-09-27 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2016-09-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-09-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-10-18 — Suspension letter written
2016-10-18 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-10-18 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-04-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-05-25 — Suspension letter written
2017-05-25 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-05-25 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-11-30 — Assigned to lie
2017-11-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2017-12-08 — Suspension inquiry written
2017-12-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2017-12-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2018-04-25 — Assigned to examiner
2018-07-10 — Assigned to examiner
2018-07-11 — Application abandoned
2018-07-11 — Application abandoned
2018-07-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Dundee Corporation
Toronto, Ontario CA
Correspondent
MIDGE M. HYMAN Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C. 114 West 47th Street New York, NY 10036 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-05-02
Status Date:
2018-07-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.