Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2012 ›
PO ›
POSTIFY
Trademark search for:
POSTIFY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-04-20 — Application filed
2012-04-24 — Application filed
2012-04-27 — Application filed
2012-08-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-08-07 — Assigned to examiner
2012-08-29 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-09-18 — Published for opposition
2012-09-18 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-11-13 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-11-26 — Teas statement of use received
2012-11-26 — Use amendment filed
2012-11-29 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-11-29 — Statement of use processing complete
2012-12-17 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2012-12-31 — Assigned to lie
2013-01-02 — Law office registration review completed
2013-01-03 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2013-02-05 — Registered-principal register
2018-02-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2018-11-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
2019-01-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2019-09-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-09-06 — Final status recorded
2019-09-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-09-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
Owner Information
Postify, LLC
Dayton , OH
Postify, LLC
Dayton , OH
Postify, LLC
Dayton , OH
Correspondent
M. Clare Frederick Richards Patent Law P.C. 20 North Clark Street, Suite 3300 Chicago, IL 60602 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-04-20
Status Date:
2019-09-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.