Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2015 ›
TE ›
TERRIFICON CT'S TERRIFIC COMIC CONVENTION
Trademark search for:
TERRIFICON CT'S TERRIFIC COMIC CONVENTION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2015-08-11 — Application filed
2015-08-14 — Application filed
2015-09-20 — Assigned to examiner
2015-09-23 — Letter of protest evidence forwarded
2015-09-25 — Letter of protest evidence reviewed-no further action taken
2015-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
2015-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
2015-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
2015-09-30 — Office action issued
2015-09-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-10-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-10-25 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-25 — Final disposition recorded
2015-10-25 — Final disposition recorded
2015-12-11 — Office action issued
2016-01-04 — Assigned to lie
2016-01-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-01-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-01-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2016-01-15 — Law office publication review completed
2016-02-03 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2016-02-23 — Published for opposition
2016-02-23 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2016-04-19 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-06-17 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2016-06-17 — Case returned to examination
2016-06-20 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2016-06-20 — Suspension letter written
2016-06-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-06-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-10-18 — Teas amendment of use received
2016-10-19 — Use amendment filed
2016-10-19 — Amendment to use processing complete
2016-10-19 — Use amendment accepted
2016-10-20 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2016-10-28 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2016-11-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-11-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-11-30 — Suspension letter written
2016-11-30 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2016-11-30 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2017-06-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2017-12-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2018-06-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2018-12-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2019-06-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2019-12-23 — Assigned to lie
2019-12-31 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2020-01-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2020-08-06 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2020-08-31 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2021-03-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2021-07-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-07-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-07-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-10-13 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2021-11-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2022-03-17 — Teas change of owner address received
2022-03-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-03-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2022-03-18 — Application abandoned
2022-03-21 — Application abandoned
2022-03-21 — Application abandoned
2022-03-21 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Big Fedora Marketing LLC
Trumbull , CT
Big Fedora Marketing LLC
Trumbull , CT
Correspondent
Mr. Frederick A. Spaeth DILWORTH IP LLC 470 James Street, Suite 007 New Haven, CT 06513 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2015-08-11
Status Date:
2022-03-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.