Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2016 ›
RU ›
RULE X MADOKS
Trademark search for:
RULE X MADOKS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-09-26 — Application filed
2016-09-29 — Application filed
2016-09-29 — Application filed
2016-09-30 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2017-01-03 — Assigned to examiner
2017-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2017-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2017-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2017-06-29 — Office action issued
2017-08-02 — Assigned to lie
2017-08-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-08-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-08-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-08-16 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-09-05 — Published for opposition
2017-09-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-10-31 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2018-03-07 — Teas statement of use received
2018-03-07 — Use amendment filed
2018-03-23 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2018-03-23 — Statement of use processing complete
2018-04-04 — Final disposition recorded
2018-04-04 — Final disposition recorded
2018-04-04 — Final disposition recorded
2018-05-09 — Assigned to examiner
2018-11-14 — Application abandoned
2018-11-14 — Application abandoned
2018-11-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Madoks, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
Madoks, Inc.
Los Angeles , CA
Correspondent
THOMAS L. DIFLOURE LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS L. DIFLOURE 13952 BORA BORA WAY, #317 MARINA DEL REY, CA 90292 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-09-26
Status Date:
2018-11-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.