Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Advertising & Business ›
2017 ›
DI ›
DISRUPTIVE PHYSICIAN
Trademark search for:
DISRUPTIVE PHYSICIAN
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-08-18 — Application filed
2017-08-22 — Application filed
2017-08-24 — Application filed
2017-11-22 — Assigned to examiner
2017-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2017-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2017-11-22 — Final disposition recorded
2018-06-20 — Application abandoned
2018-06-20 — Application abandoned
2018-08-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-08-10 — Teas petition to revive received
2018-08-10 — Petition to revive-granted
2018-08-10 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2018-08-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-08-11 — Final disposition recorded
2018-08-11 — Final disposition recorded
2018-08-11 — Final disposition recorded
2018-08-22 — Undeliverable mail - courtesy copy mailed
2018-11-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-11-08 — Office action issued
2018-11-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-11-26 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2018-12-09 — Assigned to lie
2018-12-14 — Law office publication review completed
2019-01-22 — Registered-supplemental register
2024-01-22 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2025-08-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2025-08-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DeLaRosa, Jacob
Pocatello , ID
DeLaRosa, Jacob
Pocatello , ID
Correspondent
JungJin Lee Trademark Lawyer Law Firm, PLLC P.O. Box 512 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-0512 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-08-18
Status Date:
2025-08-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.