Brandinium

Trademark search for:

AALBORG AKVAVIT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1935-08-24 — Application filed
  • 1976-06-02 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 20 yrs)
  • 1996-01-29 — Registered - sec. 9 filed/check record for sec. 8
  • 1996-03-07 — Registered and renewed (third renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2002-06-25 — Paper received
  • 2006-04-08 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2006-04-08 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2006-05-25 — Assigned to paralegal
  • 2006-08-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2006-08-05 — Registered and renewed (fourth renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2006-09-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-01-15 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2009-05-06 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-07-01 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2013-07-03 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2014-12-24 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2020-03-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-03-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ARCUS DENMARK AS
9000 AALBORG DK
ARCUS AS
1481 HAGAN NO
PERNOD RICARD DENMARK A/S
DK-1016 COPENHAGEN K DK
V&S DANMARK A/S
DK-1016 COPENHAGEN K DK
DANISCO A/S
DK-1016, COPENHAGEN DK
AKTIESELSKABET DE DANSKE SPRITFABRIKKER
COPENHAGEN DK

Correspondent

JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
600 13TH ST NW
WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1935-08-24
Status Date:
2020-03-16
Filing Year:
1935

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.