Brandinium

Trademark search for:

BACARLES

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1979-03-26 — Application filed
  • 1979-07-25 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1980-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1980-05-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1982-07-21 — Reinstated
  • 1983-03-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1983-03-29 — Notice of publication
  • 1983-05-10 — Published for opposition
  • 1983-05-10 — Published for opposition
  • 1983-08-02 — Registered-principal register
  • 1983-08-02 — Registered-principal register
  • 1989-04-03 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 1989-07-03 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2003-07-16 — Paper received
  • 2003-07-16 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
  • 2003-10-02 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2003-10-02 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2008-04-30 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2012-06-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-06-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-03-18 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2016-03-18 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Hijos de Antonio Barcelo S.A.
MADRID ES
Hijos de Antonio Barcelo S.A.
Madrid ES
Hijos de Antonio Barcelo S.A.
Madrid ES

Correspondent

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman Frayne and Schwab
666 Third Avenue 10th Floor
New York, NY 10017-5621
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1979-03-26
Status Date:
2016-03-18
Filing Year:
1979

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.