Trademark search for:

DACIA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1982-01-08 — Application filed
1982-12-07 — Assigned to examiner
1983-01-17 — Final disposition recorded
1983-03-31 — Correspondence received in law office
1983-04-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
1983-05-24 — Notice of publication
1983-05-26 — Notice of publication
1983-05-27 — Notice of publication
1983-06-14 — Published for opposition
1983-06-14 — Published for opposition
1983-09-27 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
1985-05-28 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
1986-04-17 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
1987-01-20 — Registered-principal register
1993-01-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1993-04-14 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
1993-10-07 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
1994-03-28 — Response received to post reg. action
1994-08-10 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 15
1994-08-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2006-11-22 — Case file in ticrs
2007-10-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2007-10-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

VINEXPORT TRADING COMPANY
BUCHAREST RO

FOREIGN TRADE COMPANY "FRUCTEXPORT"
BUCHAREST VII RO

FOREIGN TRADE COMPANY "FRUCTEXPORT"
BUCHAREST VII RO

Foreign Trade Enterprise Vinexport
Bucharest VII RO

Foreign Trade Enterprise Vinexport
Bucharest VII RO

Correspondent

PAULETTE R CARY BUCHMAN & O'BRIEN
10 E 40TH ST
NEW YORK, NY 10016
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1982-01-08

Status Date:
2007-10-27

Category:
Alcoholic Beverages

Filing Year:
1982

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.