Trademark search for:

CHATEAU MARQUIS DE TERME

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1984-05-29 — Application filed
1984-10-11 — Assigned to examiner
1984-12-14 — Final disposition recorded
1985-06-14 — Correspondence received in law office
1985-07-24 — Final disposition recorded
1986-01-24 — Correspondence received in law office
1986-03-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
1986-03-30 — Notice of publication
1986-04-29 — Published for opposition
1986-04-29 — Published for opposition
1986-07-22 — Registered-principal register
1992-04-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1992-07-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2002-11-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2003-01-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-07-13 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2006-07-13 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2006-09-22 — Assigned to paralegal
2006-09-25 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2006-09-25 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2006-10-05 — Case file in ticrs
2020-03-20 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2020-03-20 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

S.C.A. CHATEAU MARQUIS DE TERME-SENECLAUZE
MARGAUX FR

S.C.A. CHATEAU MARQUIS DE TERME-SENECLAUZE
MARGAUX FR

S.C.A. CHATEAU MARQUIS DE TERME-SENECLAUZE
MARGAUX FR

Correspondent

NEIL F GREENBLUM & BRUCE H BERNSTEIN GREENBLUM & BERNSTEIN PLC
1950 ROLAND CLARKE PL
RESTON, VA 20191-1411
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1984-05-29

Status Date:
2020-03-20

Category:
Alcoholic Beverages

Filing Year:
1984

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.