Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
1988 ›
GU ›
GUSANO ROJO MEZCAL LEGITIMO DE OAXACA
Trademark search for:
GUSANO ROJO MEZCAL LEGITIMO DE OAXACA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1988-05-23 — Application filed
1988-08-18 — Assigned to examiner
1988-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
1988-11-21 — Correspondence received in law office
1989-01-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
1989-03-04 — Notice of publication
1989-04-04 — Published for opposition
1989-08-11 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
1990-10-24 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
1990-11-08 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
1991-01-29 — Registered-principal register
1997-01-23 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1997-02-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2001-01-29 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2001-05-15 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 9
2001-07-25 — Response received to post reg. action - sec. 8 & 9
2001-09-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2001-09-28 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2008-12-08 — Case file in ticrs
2016-01-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-01-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
NACIONAL VINICOLA S.A.
MEXICO CITY MX
NACIONAL VINICOLA S.A.
MEXICO CITY MX
NACIONAL VINICOLA S.A.
MEXICO CITY MX
Correspondent
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN CRYSTAL SQ 5 OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELAND MAIER & NEUSTADT 1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY 4TH FL ARLINGTON, VA 22202
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1988-05-23
Status Date:
2016-01-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.