Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
1990 ›
LI ›
LILLEHAMMER 1994
Trademark search for:
LILLEHAMMER 1994
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1990-12-19 — Application filed
1991-04-16 — Assigned to examiner
1991-06-11 — Final disposition recorded
1991-12-13 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-02-12 — Office action issued
1992-08-03 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-09-23 — Letter of suspension mailed
1992-10-13 — Correspondence received in law office
1992-10-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
1992-12-11 — Notice of publication
1993-01-12 — Published for opposition
1993-09-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1993-10-06 — Notice of allowance cancelled
1993-10-06 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
1993-12-21 — Registered-principal register
1995-09-14 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
1996-03-25 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
1996-04-26 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
1996-04-26 — Cancelled section 18-partial
2007-09-06 — Case file in ticrs
2015-01-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2015-01-16 — Final status recorded
2015-01-23 — On hold - electronic record review required
Owner Information
LILLEHAMMER OLYMPISKE ORGANISASJONSKOMITE AS
2600 Lillehammer NO
LILLEHAMMER OLYMPISKE ORGANISASJONSKOMITE AS
2600 Lillehammer NO
LILLEHAMMER OLYMPISKE ORGANISASJONSKOMITE AS
2600 Lillehammer NO
Correspondent
WILLIAM J EGAN III FLEHR, HOHBACH, TEST, ALBRITTON & HERBERT FOUR EMBARCADERO CTR STE 3400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4187
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1990-12-19
Status Date:
2015-01-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.