Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
1990 ›
TH ›
THE LOMBARD COLLECTION
Trademark search for:
THE LOMBARD COLLECTION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1990-08-24 — Application filed
1991-02-01 — Assigned to examiner
1991-02-14 — Final disposition recorded
1991-08-16 — Correspondence received in law office
1991-09-19 — Correspondence received in law office
1991-10-15 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1991-10-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
1992-02-28 — Notice of publication
1992-03-31 — Published for opposition
1992-06-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1992-12-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
1993-01-05 — Sou extension 1 granted
1993-06-15 — Sou extension 2 filed
1993-07-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
1993-12-21 — Sou extension 3 filed
1994-02-14 — Sou extension 3 granted
1994-06-09 — Use amendment filed
1994-07-28 — Statement of use processing complete
1994-08-09 — Assigned to examiner
1994-08-22 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
1995-01-17 — Registered-principal register
2000-03-01 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2000-05-20 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2005-10-22 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2005-10-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Lombard Scotch Whisky Limited
London GB
Lombard Scotch Whisky Limited
London GB
Lombard Scotch Whisky Limited
London GB
Correspondent
SUSAN B FLOHR LALOS & KEEGAN STE 500 1146 NINETEENTH ST N W WASHINGTON, DC 20036-3703
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1990-08-24
Status Date:
2005-10-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.