Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
1997 ›
ZA ›
ZARSKAYA DATSCHA MACCAHAPA
Trademark search for:
ZARSKAYA DATSCHA MACCAHAPA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1997-10-28 — Application filed
1998-03-26 — Assigned to examiner
1998-06-04 — Final disposition recorded
1998-06-18 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-12-31 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1999-01-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
1999-03-05 — Notice of publication
1999-04-06 — Published for opposition
1999-06-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1999-12-06 — Use amendment filed
1999-12-06 — Statement of use processing complete
2000-02-22 — Assigned to examiner
2000-02-28 — Final disposition recorded
2000-08-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-02-14 — Final disposition recorded
2001-04-12 — Petition to director received
2001-08-16 — Petition to director granted
2001-08-16 — Assigned to examiner
2001-08-16 — Sec. 1(b) claim deleted
2001-08-16 — Sec. 44(e) claim added
2002-08-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2002-10-23 — Notice of publication
2002-11-12 — Published for opposition
2003-02-04 — Registered-principal register
2008-03-27 — Case file in ticrs
2009-09-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2009-09-12 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
S. Fassbind AG
6414 Obararth CH
S. Fassbind AG
6414 Obararth CH
S. Fassbind AG
6414 Obararth CH
Correspondent
JOSEPH D LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG 750 17TH ST NW STE 900 WASHINGTON, DC 20006 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1997-10-28
Status Date:
2009-09-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.