Trademark search for:

SOLECA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2012-04-11 — Application filed
2012-04-14 — Application filed
2012-04-18 — Application filed
2012-04-19 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-07-26 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-26 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-26 — Assigned to examiner
2012-07-26 — Final disposition recorded
2012-10-10 — Office action issued
2012-10-23 — Assigned to lie
2012-10-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-10-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-10-28 — Final disposition recorded
2012-10-28 — Final disposition recorded
2012-10-28 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-11-26 — Office action issued
2012-11-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-12-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-12-18 — Law office publication review completed
2013-01-02 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2013-01-22 — Published for opposition
2013-01-22 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2013-04-09 — Registered-principal register
2018-04-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-11-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-11-15 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Viñas Bisquertt Ltda.
Santiago CL

Viñas Bisquertt Ltda.
Santiago CL

Viñas Bisquertt Ltda.
Santiago CL

Correspondent

LISABETH H. COAKLEY/JESSICA S. SACHS HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE, P.L.C.
5445 CORPORATE DR STE 200
TROY, MI 48098-2683
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-04-11

Status Date:
2019-11-15

Category:
Alcoholic Beverages

Filing Year:
2000

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.