Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2002 ›
GO ›
GOTLAND VODKA
Trademark search for:
GOTLAND VODKA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2002-12-17 — Application filed
2003-05-27 — Assigned to examiner
2003-06-18 — Assigned to examiner
2003-06-20 — Final disposition recorded
2003-07-25 — Paper received
2003-07-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-08-25 — Case file in ticrs
2003-09-22 — Final disposition recorded
2004-02-23 — Paper received
2004-02-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-05-11 — Office action issued
2004-11-15 — Paper received
2004-11-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-11-24 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2004-11-29 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2004-11-29 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2004-11-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-12-22 — Final disposition recorded
2004-12-22 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2005-03-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-03-17 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2005-03-27 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-02-07 — Paper received
2007-02-07 — Exparte appeal dismissed - failure to file brief
2007-02-22 — Application abandoned
2007-02-22 — Application abandoned
2007-02-22 — Exparte appeal terminated
2007-02-22 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Romo Hermanas, S.A. De C.V.
Colonia Nueva Anzures MX
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 3RD AVE 10TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2002-12-17
Status Date:
2007-02-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.