Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2003 ›
CH ›
CHUCK SHAW
Trademark search for:
CHUCK SHAW
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-04-02 — Application filed
2007-04-05 — Application filed
2007-06-20 — Assigned to examiner
2007-06-21 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-06-21 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-06-22 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2007-06-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-08-09 — Assigned to lie
2007-08-09 — Law office publication review completed
2007-08-22 — Notice of publication
2007-09-11 — Published for opposition
2007-12-04 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-05-29 — Sou teas extension received
2008-05-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-05-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-11-20 — Sou teas extension received
2008-11-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-11-20 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-06-04 — Sou teas extension received
2009-06-04 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-06-26 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-06-26 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-11-30 — Sou teas extension received
2009-11-30 — Sou extension 4 filed
2010-01-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-01-19 — Sou extension 4 granted
2010-07-05 — Application abandoned
2010-07-05 — Final status recorded
2010-07-06 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Bronco Wine Company
Ceres , CA
Bronco Wine Company
Ceres , CA
Correspondent
Nicholas J. Vogt, Esq. ROPES & GRAY LLP One International Place Boston, MA 02110-2624 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-04-02
Status Date:
2010-07-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.