Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2003 ›
ES ›
ESPRIT DE BEAUCASTEL
Trademark search for:
ESPRIT DE BEAUCASTEL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-05-12 — Application filed
2003-11-02 — Assigned to examiner
2003-11-17 — Final disposition recorded
2004-01-09 — Paper received
2004-01-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-02-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-04-07 — Notice of publication
2004-04-27 — Published for opposition
2004-05-10 — Paper received
2004-07-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-01-18 — Use amendment filed
2005-01-24 — Paper received
2005-02-28 — Statement of use processing complete
2005-03-07 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2005-03-11 — Assigned to lie
2005-03-14 — Law office registration review completed
2005-05-31 — Registered-principal register
2009-02-02 — Paper received
2009-03-16 — Review of correspondence complete
2011-04-11 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2011-04-22 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-04-22 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2016-01-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-01-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SOCIETE FERMIERE DES VIGNOBLES PIERRE PERRIN
Courthezon FR
SOCIETE FERMIERE DES VIGNOBLES PIERRE PERRIN
Courthezon FR
SOCIETE FERMIERE DES VIGNOBLES PIERRE PERRIN
Courthezon FR
Correspondent
George A. Pelletier, Jr. Cantor Colburn LLP 20 Church Street 22nd Floor Hartford, CT 06103
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-05-12
Status Date:
2016-01-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.