Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2004 ›
PR ›
PREMIUM DE-LUXE NEMIROFF
Trademark search for:
PREMIUM DE-LUXE NEMIROFF
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-03-23 — Application filed
2004-05-13 — Sn assigned for sect 66a subseq desig from ib
2004-05-17 — Application filed
2004-09-30 — Assigned to examiner
2004-10-25 — Final disposition recorded
2004-10-28 — Final disposition recorded
2004-11-29 — Office action issued
2005-04-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2005-04-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-04-14 — Office action issued
2005-04-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-04-27 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-05-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-05-20 — Assigned to lie
2005-05-27 — Law office publication review completed
2005-08-29 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2005-09-09 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2005-10-13 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2005-10-13 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2005-11-03 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2006-01-20 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-01-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-01-20 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-01-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-01-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-01-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-01-23 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2006-01-27 — Assigned to lie
2006-02-09 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-02-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-02-09 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-02-09 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2006-02-10 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-02-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-02-10 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-02-10 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2006-03-08 — Law office publication review completed
2006-04-12 — Notice of publication
2006-04-20 — Change of owner received from ib
2006-05-02 — Published for opposition
2006-07-25 — Registered-principal register
2007-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-18 — Final disposition recorded
2011-04-16 — New representative at ib received
2011-12-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2011-12-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-07-10 — Teas section 71 & 15 received
2012-08-20 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-08-20 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 & 15 - e-mailed
2012-08-20 — Registered - sec. 71 accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-08-20 — Registered - sec. 71 & sec. 15 filed
2013-04-19 — International registration renewed
2015-07-25 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (10-yr) e-mailed
2021-02-26 — Cancelled section 71
2021-10-26 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2021-11-18 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
2021-11-18 — Generic madrid transaction created
2021-11-20 — New representative at ib received
2022-01-09 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2023-03-30 — Final status recorded
2023-10-29 — Death of international registration
2023-10-29 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
Nemiroff Intellectual Property Establishment
LI
Nemiroff Intellectual Property Establishment
LI
Nemiroff Intellectual Property Establishment
LI
BREYFIELD Trust reg.
LI
Correspondent
Mark A Steiner Duane Morris LLP Spear Tower, One Market Plaza, Ste. 2200 San Francisco, CA 94105-1127 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-03-23
Status Date:
2023-03-30
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.