Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2007 ›
CO ›
COGNAC LOUIS ROYER FORCE 53° HIGH STRENGTH
Trademark search for:
COGNAC LOUIS ROYER FORCE 53° HIGH STRENGTH
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-12-12 — Application filed
2008-02-21 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2008-02-22 — Application filed
2008-03-20 — Assigned to examiner
2008-04-04 — Final disposition recorded
2008-04-05 — Office action issued
2008-04-07 — Office action issued
2008-04-07 — Office action issued
2008-04-24 — Office action issued
2008-10-06 — Office action issued
2008-10-22 — Office action issued
2008-10-22 — Office action issued
2008-10-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-10-22 — Assigned to lie
2008-10-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-07-23 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2009-07-23 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2009-08-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-08-06 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2009-08-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-08-27 — Application abandoned
2009-08-27 — Application abandoned
2010-08-27 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-27 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-24 — Final disposition recorded
2017-12-13 — Final status recorded
2018-06-29 — Death of international registration
2018-06-30 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed
Correspondent
Dianne Smith-Misemer Hovey Williams LLP 10801 Mastin Blvd., Suite 1000 Overland Park, KS 66210 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-12-12
Status Date:
2017-12-13
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.