Trademark search for:

RIGLOS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2007-01-20 — Application filed
2007-01-24 — Application filed
2007-05-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-05-09 — Assigned to examiner
2007-05-25 — Assigned to lie
2007-05-25 — Law office publication review completed
2007-08-15 — Notice of publication
2007-09-04 — Published for opposition
2007-11-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-11-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-01-10 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
2008-02-21 — Teas statement of use received
2008-02-21 — Use amendment filed
2008-03-17 — Statement of use processing complete
2008-03-29 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2008-04-08 — Law office registration review completed
2008-04-08 — Assigned to lie
2008-05-13 — Registered-principal register
2013-09-04 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
2013-09-04 — Teas section 8 received
2013-09-13 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-09-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2013-09-13 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2017-05-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-12-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2018-12-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

FINCA LAS DIVAS S.A.
Buenos Aires AR

FINCA LAS DIVAS S.A.
Buenos Aires AR

FINCA LAS DIVAS S.A.
Buenos Aires AR

Correspondent

Arturo Perez-Guerrero LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PEREZ-GUERRERO
P.O.BOX 9024163
SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2007-01-20

Status Date:
2018-12-14

Category:
Alcoholic Beverages

Filing Year:
2007

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.