Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2007 ›
SI ›
SINGATA
Trademark search for:
SINGATA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-03-14 — Application filed
2007-03-19 — Application filed
2007-06-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-06-25 — Assigned to examiner
2007-06-28 — Final disposition recorded
2007-06-28 — Final disposition recorded
2007-06-28 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-12-20 — Office action issued
2007-12-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-12-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-02-02 — Assigned to lie
2008-02-02 — Law office publication review completed
2008-02-20 — Notice of publication
2008-03-11 — Published for opposition
2008-05-27 — Registered-principal register
2014-05-27 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2014-06-11 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2014-06-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2014-06-11 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2015-12-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-05-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2017-06-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-12-28 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2018-12-28 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Einig-Zenzen GmbH & Co. KG
Kaisersesch DE
Einig-Zenzen GmbH & Co. KG
Kaisersesch DE
Einig-Zenzen GmbH & Co. KG
Kaisersesch DE
Correspondent
Scott Q. Vidas VIDAS, ARRETT & STEINKRAUS, P.A. 8050 Washington Ave. S. Suite 100 EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-03-14
Status Date:
2018-12-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.