Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2008 ›
CA ›
CASTILLO RUM/RHUM ANEJO
Trademark search for:
CASTILLO RUM/RHUM ANEJO
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-09-08 — Application filed
2008-09-11 — Application filed
2008-09-12 — Notice of design search code mailed
2008-11-14 — Assigned to examiner
2008-11-21 — Final disposition recorded
2008-11-21 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-03-20 — Office action issued
2009-03-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-03-27 — Office action issued
2009-03-30 — Office action issued
2009-03-30 — Assigned to lie
2009-09-30 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-09-30 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2009-09-30 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2009-09-30 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2009-10-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-10-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-10-22 — Final disposition recorded
2009-10-22 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2010-01-04 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2010-02-23 — Examiners statement - completed
2010-02-24 — Examiners statement mailed
2010-07-07 — Office action issued
2010-09-20 — Application abandoned
2010-09-20 — Exparte appeal terminated
2010-09-20 — Final status recorded
2010-09-21 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
JOSE CUERVO, S.A. DE C.V.
Mexico, D.F. MX
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E. ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 3RD AVE NEW YORK, NY 10017-4011 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-09-08
Status Date:
2010-09-20
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.