Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2009 ›
CR ›
CRAZY CROCO
Trademark search for:
CRAZY CROCO
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-01-05 — Application filed
2009-01-08 — Application filed
2009-01-09 — Notice of design search code mailed
2009-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-20 — Assigned to examiner
2009-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-04 — Office action issued
2009-05-04 — Assigned to lie
2009-05-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-05-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-06-12 — Law office publication review completed
2009-07-01 — Notice of publication
2009-07-21 — Published for opposition
2009-10-13 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-04-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-05-17 — Application abandoned
2010-05-17 — Application abandoned
2010-05-24 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2010-05-24 — Petition to revive-granted
2010-05-24 — Teas petition to revive received
2010-06-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-06-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-06-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2010-11-15 — Application abandoned
2010-11-15 — Application abandoned
2010-11-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Dear, Inc.
Atlanta , GA
Dear, Inc.
Atlanta , GA
Correspondent
PAULETTE R. CAREY BUCHMAN LAW FIRM, LLP 510 THORNALL ST STE 200 EDISON, NJ 08837-2204 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-01-05
Status Date:
2010-11-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.