Brandinium

Trademark search for:

GARNETT CREEK

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2013-11-13 — Application filed
  • 2013-11-16 — Application filed
  • 2013-11-26 — Application filed
  • 2014-02-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2014-02-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-02-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-02-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-04-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-04-15 — Office action issued
  • 2014-04-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-04-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2014-05-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2014-05-03 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2014-05-12 — Letter of protest evidence reviewed-no further action taken
  • 2014-05-12 — Letter of protest evidence forwarded
  • 2014-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-05-13 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2014-05-13 — Withdrawn from pub - managing attorney request
  • 2014-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-05-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-05-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-05-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2014-05-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2014-05-30 — Office action issued
  • 2014-05-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2014-06-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2014-06-04 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2014-06-18 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2014-07-08 — Published for opposition
  • 2014-07-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2014-08-01 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2014-11-26 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2015-01-20 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
  • 2015-03-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2015-05-29 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-07-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2015-07-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2015-07-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2015-07-11 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2015-09-01 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2015-09-01 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2016-02-03 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2016-02-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2016-03-07 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2016-03-07 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2016-03-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2016-08-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2016-08-26 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2016-09-20 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2016-09-21 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2016-09-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2017-01-23 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2017-01-23 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2017-01-23 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2017-01-25 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2017-08-28 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2017-08-28 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2017-09-01 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2017-09-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2018-04-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2018-04-09 — Application abandoned
  • 2018-04-09 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

GARNET WINE COMPANY, LLC
Ceres , CA
Garnett Creek Wines LLC
Calistoga , CA
Garnett Creek Wines LLC
Calistoga , CA

Correspondent

Angela C. Wilcox, Esq. Vanek, Vickers & Masini, P.C.
55 West Monroe
Suite 3500
Chicago, IL 60603

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2013-11-13
Status Date:
2018-04-09
Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.