Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CODY'S

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-03-26 — Application filed
  • 2010-03-30 — Application filed
  • 2010-03-31 — Application filed
  • 2010-04-12 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2010-04-23 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2010-04-23 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-05-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-05-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-06-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2010-06-26 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-06-28 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2010-08-03 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-08-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-09-28 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
  • 2010-09-28 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2010-09-28 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-09-29 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-09-29 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2010-11-02 — Registered-principal register
  • 2011-07-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-11-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-06-09 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-06-09 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Independent Liquor (NZ) Limited
Papakura, Auckland NZ
Independent Liquor (NZ) Limited
Papakura, Auckland NZ
Independent Liquor (NZ) Limited
Papakura, Auckland NZ

Correspondent

Barry Strike Strike & Techel
556 Commercial St.
San Francisco, CA 94111
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-03-26
Status Date:
2017-06-09
Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.