Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2010 ›
CU ›
CULT MODJO
Trademark search for:
CULT MODJO
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-03-17 — Application filed
2010-04-22 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2010-04-23 — Application filed
2010-04-27 — Application filed
2010-04-28 — Assigned to examiner
2010-05-06 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-07 — Office action issued
2010-05-07 — Office action issued
2010-06-02 — Final disposition recorded
2010-06-03 — Office action issued
2010-06-03 — Office action issued
2010-06-03 — Office action issued
2010-07-02 — Office action issued
2011-01-04 — Application abandoned
2011-01-04 — Application abandoned
2011-09-28 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2011-09-28 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2012-01-04 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-06 — Final disposition recorded
2012-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-27 — New representative at ib received
2012-06-09 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2013-06-17 — New representative at ib received
2014-08-21 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
2019-07-11 — Change of owner received from ib
2020-03-18 — Final status recorded
2020-10-02 — Death of international registration
2020-10-03 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed
Owner Information
Royal Unibrew A/S
DK
BEV.CON ApS
DK
Correspondent
Chas. Hude A/S H.C. Andersens Boulevard 33 DK-1780 Copenhagen V, DENMARK
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-03-17
Status Date:
2020-03-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.