Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2011 ›
MA ›
MAGIC GARDEN
Trademark search for:
MAGIC GARDEN
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-06-17 — Application filed
2011-06-21 — Application filed
2011-06-22 — Application filed
2011-09-28 — Assigned to examiner
2011-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2011-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2011-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2012-04-20 — Office action issued
2012-04-27 — Assigned to lie
2012-05-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-05-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-05-30 — Suspension letter written
2012-05-30 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-05-30 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2012-12-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2012-12-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-12-05 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2012-12-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-12-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-23 — Final disposition recorded
2013-06-19 — Office action issued
2013-06-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-06-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-07-10 — Office action issued
2013-07-10 — Office action issued
2013-07-10 — Office action issued
2014-01-10 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2014-01-10 — Teas request to divide received
2014-01-10 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2014-01-10 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2014-01-10 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2014-01-10 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2014-01-10 — Divisional request received
2014-01-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2014-01-22 — Divisional processing complete
2014-01-30 — Examiners amendment -written
2014-01-30 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2014-01-30 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2014-01-30 — Examiner's amendment entered
2014-01-31 — Examiner's amendment entered
2014-02-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-02-04 — Exparte appeal terminated
2014-02-07 — Law office publication review completed
2014-02-23 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2014-02-27 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2014-03-03 — Final disposition recorded
2014-03-03 — Final disposition recorded
2014-03-03 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-03 — Office action issued
2014-09-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-09-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-09-25 — Office action issued
2014-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-25 — Final disposition recorded
2015-03-25 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2015-03-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-03-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-03-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-03-31 — Law office publication review completed
2015-04-15 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-05-05 — Published for opposition
2015-05-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-07-21 — Registered-principal register
2019-09-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-09-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2020-07-21 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2022-01-28 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2022-01-28 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Lanarkshire GB
Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Lanarkshire GB
Albert Bartlett & Sons (Airdrie) Limited
Lanarkshire GB
Correspondent
Jonathan D. Reichman, Esquire Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP 200 Park Avenue New York, NY 10166 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-06-17
Status Date:
2022-01-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.