Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2011 ›
SR ›
SR. KOCTEL
Trademark search for:
SR. KOCTEL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2011-02-22 — Application filed
2011-02-25 — Application filed
2011-02-25 — Application filed
2011-05-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2011-05-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-05-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-05-23 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2011-05-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2011-05-23 — Assigned to examiner
2011-06-08 — Assigned to lie
2011-06-08 — Law office publication review completed
2011-07-12 — Published for opposition
2011-07-12 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-09-06 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-03-06 — Sou teas extension received
2012-03-06 — Sou extension 1 filed
2012-03-06 — Sou extension 1 granted
2012-03-08 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-09-06 — Sou teas extension received
2012-09-06 — Sou extension 2 filed
2012-09-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-09-10 — Sou extension 2 granted
2012-09-11 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2013-04-08 — Application abandoned
2013-04-08 — Application abandoned
2013-04-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sr. Koctel, LLC
San Diego , CA
Sr. Koctel, LLC
San Diego , CA
Correspondent
CARLO F. VAN DEN BOSCH SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTHER & HAMPTON LLP 650 TOWN CENTER DR FL 4 COSTA MESA, CA 92626-1993 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2011-02-22
Status Date:
2013-04-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.