Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CAVIAR LIME

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2012-11-13 — Application filed
  • 2012-11-16 — Application filed
  • 2012-11-19 — Application filed
  • 2013-03-08 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2013-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-04-05 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2013-04-05 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-04-05 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2013-04-05 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2013-04-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2013-04-24 — Assigned to lie
  • 2013-04-24 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2013-05-04 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2013-05-06 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2013-05-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-05-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-05-29 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-11-26 — Teas amendment of use received
  • 2013-11-27 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 2013-11-27 — Use amendment filed
  • 2013-11-27 — Office action issued
  • 2013-11-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2013-11-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2013-12-20 — Suspension letter written
  • 2013-12-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-12-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2013-12-20 — Use amendment accepted
  • 2013-12-21 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
  • 2014-06-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2014-12-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2015-06-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2016-01-04 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2016-07-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2017-01-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2017-07-10 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2017-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-08-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-11-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-11-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-02-05 — Office action issued
  • 2018-02-05 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-02-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-02-26 — Approved for registration supplemental register
  • 2018-03-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2018-04-03 — Registered-supplemental register
  • 2021-01-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-01-02 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-01-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-01-02 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-01-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-01-02 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2023-04-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2023-05-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2023-05-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2023-05-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2024-10-25 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2024-10-25 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Ascendant Spirits, Inc.
Santa Barbara , CA
Ascendant Spirits, Inc.
Santa Barbara , CA

Correspondent

Matthew D. Francis BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP
675 15th Street Suite 2900
Denver, CO 80202
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2012-11-13
Status Date:
2024-10-25
Filing Year:
2012

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.