Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Alcoholic Beverages ›
2012 ›
CO ›
CONSONANCE BRIDGE
Trademark search for:
CONSONANCE BRIDGE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-01-10 — Application filed
2012-01-13 — Application filed
2012-01-13 — Application filed
2012-04-16 — Assigned to examiner
2012-04-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-04-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-05-16 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-06-05 — Published for opposition
2012-06-05 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-07-31 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2012-09-24 — Teas statement of use received
2012-09-24 — Use amendment filed
2012-09-26 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-09-26 — Statement of use processing complete
2012-10-17 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2012-10-31 — Assigned to lie
2012-11-03 — Law office registration review completed
2012-11-06 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2012-12-11 — Registered-principal register
2016-02-03 — Teas change of owner address received
2016-02-03 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2017-12-11 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-07-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-07-12 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Intervine Inc.
Napa , CA
Intervine Inc.
Napa , CA
Intervine Inc.
Napa , CA
Correspondent
J. Scott Gerien DICKENSON PEATMAN & FOGARTY 1455 FIRST STREET, STE 301 NAPA, CA 94559 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-01-10
Status Date:
2019-07-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.