Trademark search for:

MAXIMO DE CODORNIZ

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2015-04-22 — Application filed
2015-04-25 — Application filed
2015-05-01 — Application filed
2015-07-31 — Assigned to examiner
2015-07-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-08-19 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-09-08 — Published for opposition
2015-09-08 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-11-03 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-02-24 — Teas statement of use received
2016-02-24 — Use amendment filed
2016-03-31 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2016-04-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-04-05 — Statement of use processing complete
2016-04-06 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2016-04-07 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2016-05-10 — Registered-principal register
2020-11-02 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
2021-02-02 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
2021-02-02 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
2021-02-02 — Cancelled section 18-total
2021-02-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

COMPAÑIA TEQUILERA DE ARANDAS, S.A. DE C.V.
Gomez Portugal MX

COMPAÑIA TEQUILERA DE ARANDAS, S.A. DE C.V.
Gomez Portugal MX

COMPAÑIA TEQUILERA DE ARANDAS, S.A. DE C.V.
Gomez Portugal MX

Correspondent

COMPAÑIA TEQUILERA DE ARANDAS, S.A. DE C.V.
KM 0115 ALTOS
CARRETERA A SAN ANTONIO DE LOS HORCONES
GOMEZ PORTUGAL, 20909

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2015-04-22

Status Date:
2021-02-02

Category:
Alcoholic Beverages

Filing Year:
2015

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.